#096 Blitz Q–Which One Is the Better Version of Cosmos: Carl Sagan’s or Neil deGrasse Tyson’s?

As much of a documentary nut as I am, I have to admit I’ve never seen a second of Cosmos–either version. I’ve heard about it occasionally over the decades and then of course came the newer version.

Part of me would lean toward Tyson’s because I’d bet that there’s extra science in there not known in Sagan’s time, and that would be beneficial. However, since so many science buffs still fanboy (or fangirl) over Sagan, and I’ve never seen either one, I can’t make that distinction.

Anybody watched Sagan’s, Tyson’s, or both? What were your thoughts about them series, and was it/were they as good as their reputations suggest?

I’m tempted to buy one of ’em, I’m just wondering which I should go with so I can binge watch the awesomeness of the universe (yes, documentaries and lectures are my binge-material rather than fictional TV–go figure).

Floor’s yours… I’m a very curious person.

One thought on “#096 Blitz Q–Which One Is the Better Version of Cosmos: Carl Sagan’s or Neil deGrasse Tyson’s?

Penny for your thoughts? We'll listen...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.